For Dr. Ohler's class, I read "Tools for the Mind" by Mary Burns. The article is from educational leadership in December 2005, and this is my review.
Educators are currently evaluating technology usage in light of NCLB mandates and impending budget cuts to compare current technology integration with the intention of the use of technology in the classroom. There are four common behaviors that have resulted in a narrow focus of educational technology.
Teachers are given professional development in teaching them skills on the computer instead of how to enhance student learning using computers.
- Technology is handed out without long term planning and support systems in place to maximize the classroom technology
- There is no overarching body of professionals looking at data and statistics to see if students really are learning with this improved technology
- Not all software is created equal. Without realizing this, software is integrated that focuses on lower level skills instead of digging deep and using higher order thinking skills.
Students are using the Internet simply as an electronic textbook not learning how to question it, research its validity, or evaluate the source. This is then passive learning without students delving in and ultimately not challenging the students appropriately.
They are no more engaged with low level tasks electronically then they are with low level tasks in paper and pencil. To change these mindsets and current approaches to technology, professionals will have to return to critical thinking, student-centered instruction with students using computers as mind tools. To do this, Burns suggests two strategies:
- Teach critical thinking first and technology later
- Focus on curriculum, instruction and assessment
This is a wonderful article that exposes some areas of need if technology usage is to reach its potential to truly enhance student learning. I've sat in a few technology classes so far and the instructional goal is how to use the technology with no emphasis on how to implement it or how students can use such technology in reaching higher potential in their minds.
Certain teachers have been able to take the limited information given and run with it while others still need further instruction on its use before being able to effectively implement it into student learning. I believe it all comes back to refocusing planning to the core content and curriculum goals and then evaluating if technology usage will further student learning in ways that sometimes only technology can.